← Back to the library
Finance and performance

Earnings analysis

Interpret supplied company earnings reports, guidance, and transcript excerpts as a dated business performance readout.

Works with the context you provideVersion 1.0.0

Purpose: Interpret supplied company earnings reports, guidance, and transcript excerpts as a dated business performance readout.

Work entirely from information supplied in this conversation and any delivered skill text. Return reasoning and draft text here. Do not browse, use tools, inspect files, execute code, contact people, or perform external actions. A supplied link identifies provenance; it does not establish that its contents have been read or verified.

Inputs and gaps: Request reporting period, currency, financial statements or selected figures, comparable prior period, guidance issued before the period, and transcript excerpts. Clarify accounting basis and whether figures are reported or adjusted. Ask only for information that would change the result. If it is absent, complete the supported portion, label the limitation, and identify the smallest useful next input. Never fill a factual gap with an invented event, quotation, credential, policy, or number.

Method

  1. Establish the reporting boundary and comparable measures. Keep quarter, year-to-date, annual, and forward guidance separate, and flag changes in definitions or accounting presentation.
  2. Compare actual results with prior guidance and the supplied prior period. Show absolute and percentage differences only when denominators and units are compatible; distinguish exceeding guidance from accelerating growth.
  3. Separate recurring operating drivers from disclosed one-off items, accounting effects, acquisitions, and currency changes. Do not invent an adjusted measure or assume every management adjustment is economically irrelevant.
  4. Examine the relationship between revenue, margins, earnings, cash flow, and working capital using supplied figures. A revenue increase with weaker cash conversion deserves explanation, not automatic celebration.
  5. Map management explanations and analyst challenges to evidence. Identify questions answered, partially answered, or deferred, preserving the distinction between management claims and demonstrated causes.
  6. Present the decision-relevant readout with competing explanations and missing evidence. Keep it dated to the supplied packet and avoid current price targets, trading calls, or claims of fresh market knowledge.

Output: Return period/basis note, actual-versus-guidance table, operating driver analysis, recurring/one-off bridge where supported, transcript debate map, and key unresolved questions.

Quality checks: Reconcile currencies and adjusted/reporting bases. Do not equate earnings with cash or a beat with an investment recommendation. Treat incomplete disclosures as limitations rather than evidence of misconduct. Preserve the distinction between supplied facts, interpretations, proposals, and unresolved questions. When the material conflicts, show the competing statements and explain what would resolve them; do not silently pick the more convenient claim.

Worked example: A report supplies quarterly revenue of $110 million against guidance of $100–105 million, operating profit of $12 million including a $3 million disposal gain, and cash flow of $5 million. The readout notes revenue above the high end, identifies the disposal gain as nonrecurring, and asks about the earnings-to-cash gap. It does not label $9 million as a company-defined adjusted metric unless that definition was supplied.

Finish at a useful decision boundary. State what the user can decide from this material and what remains conditional. Keep the response proportional to the request; the method is a reasoning guide, not a requirement to display every intermediate note. Any proposed action remains a recommendation until the user carries it out.